Are you saying DOT has not done any flow work? Explain? How about more into his motor than most people make in a year.
Wouldn't this make it easier to make 800+ HP while putting less stress on the motor?
Do you know what "more complete cylinder filling" is trying to say? It's simply Volumetric Efficiency. And while with God's gift to heads/cam you might bump VE from say 80% to high 90's.... hell, say 100%, that's still not jack.
A 7.3L powerstroke spinning 4000rpm moves 411 cubic feet of air every minute at a VE of 80%. Now you take God's gift to headflow, slap that baby on there and you might honestly bump that to just over 480CFM if you can rank VE in the 95+% range. Hell, if you sold your soul to the Devil himself, and stuck a perfect 100% VE you would only be at 514CFM.
Am I supposed to believe that 100CFM is going to make or break the deal here? Especially considering that an engine like the 5.9 12v engine would only be moving 416CFM at that same rpm AT
100% VE! I think we all know the 5.9 12v head is a bit
more capable than 800ish hp.
Just saying. That's a LOT of money..... for nothing
when you realize that bolting it on the truck picks up less power than 20lbs of boost. Especially when the same money spent on an injection system would have produced a tenfold power increase, if not more, for the same coin.
Cool..... okay. Neato, yes. Practical.... at this point
That's just me. I'm dumb.